I do believe that the "more like this" function that puts similar deviations to the one your currently viewing on the right hand side of the page may just be a little bit....well,
sucky. Maybe they should work with keywords
as well as categories instead of one or the other?
I do not want to be suggested this:
<da:thumb id="397233837"/><da:thumb id="397588051"/>
while I'm looking at this:
<da:thumb id="398029953"/>
I have nothing against plus-sized people, I just feel that people don't really understand the category descriptions when they post things.
Since when does "Photography>People and Portraits>Body Art" - for which the official description is:
"Photographs of human subjects with artistically arranged temporary or permanent cosmetic decorative elements such as tattoos, body paint, and rhinestones." - include images such as the above?
I'm really starting to get the vibe that I am one of few people who actually reads the descriptions before I submit my stuff.Let me show you a little bit more....
<da:thumb id="397891591"/>
How is this "Make-Up>Beauty"? It's not. Plain and simple.
How about this?
This one has makeup in it, which is a good start, but you can barely see it. It should really go into scraps, or at best under Self-Portraits.
This was put under "Digital Art>Fractal Art".
IT'S A PHOTOGRAPH. Probably the only digital thing about it.
Oh this? Well this is apparently "Photography>Architecture>Interior".
Photograph? Yes, but of a mesh screen with a plant behind it. Pretty much the only thing that makes it interior architecture is that it's inside and shows part of a window frame.
<da:thumb id="388790658"/>
This is a photograph too. If you're an idiot who can't read, or a lazy bum who can't be bothered to take 30 seconds to choose the right category to submit to.
Man I wish I had these powers.